Source fetched 2026-09-22T12:27:16Z
Exact-token support is source-listed The protocol or product source names this exact token. No configuration decoding or read-only execution simulation was performed.
Source-described use: Post this exact mint as collateral in a configured Kamino market and borrow an eligible debt asset against it.
Open GLXY token report · Open superstate-opening-bell issuer dossier
2HehXG149TXuVptQhbiWAWDjbbuCsXSAtLTB5wc2aajK| Role | Address | Existence check | Expected owner | Observed program owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| collateral-reserve | 4v8hN3DgJ86qH1KBr9PCKSgi3t8F1MJc7n6Wzsbw1C6g | exists | Not established | KLend2g3cP87fffoy8q1mQqGKjrxjC8boSyAYavgmjD |
| lending-market | CF32kn7AY8X1bW7ZkGcHc4X9ZWTxqKGCJk6QwrQkDcdw | exists | Not established | KLend2g3cP87fffoy8q1mQqGKjrxjC8boSyAYavgmjD |
The current source data records observed owners, not a separately published expected-owner assertion; where no such assertion exists, it remains not established. Account existence and owner corroborate the published reference but do not independently decode configuration or prove a user action can succeed.
CF32kn7AY8X1bW7ZkGcHc4X9ZWTxqKGCJk6QwrQkDcdwThe share can move only to an eligible owner
A liquidation cannot send the registered share to an arbitrary buyer or AMM. The lender or buyer must be eligible and reflected in the register, so enforcement depends on transfer-agent cooperation even though the collateral is a real share.
The register and clawback support intervention
The transfer agent can freeze accounts and use the permanent delegate to move or burn balances after a hack. That can preserve the registered owner's rights, but makes an on-chain protocol's possession non-final.
Registered ownership can survive key loss
Because the shareholder is identified on the register, the transfer agent can potentially cancel or move a stranded token and preserve the share. The protocol cannot trigger that remedy without the transfer agent accepting the claim.
These are issuer-plus-control-recipe conclusions from the matched legal template — not protocol simulation results.
Issuer-dependent exit — Code can hold the balance, but seizure or realisation still depends on issuer recognition, allowlisting, or a claim weaker than possession suggests.