RWA Sonar

Issuer programme dossier

Ventuals Pre-IPO

Nothing was owned.

defunctderivative0 exact Solana tokensclaim rung 0 · synthetic exposure
Observed18 Sep 2026 11:50 UTC Coverage37 of 46 required fields sourced Basis84 structured claims · current reviewed understanding LimitUnknown means not established, never “no”

The short answer

Can the issuer intervene?No listed override is active in the observed token recipes.

Control is reported as observed powers, not collapsed into a score.

Understand issuer powers →

Technology + legal templates

These conclusions apply only to the exact programme and observed control recipe shown.

Current Solana assets

0 exact token addresses currently inherit this issuer-level analysis unless an asset card records an exception.

Legal claim and issuing chain
Issuing entity
VNTL Markets S.A., a Panama corporation, at Ave Ricardo J Alfaro, Betania, PH Century Tower, Floor 3, Office 317, Zip Code 07095, Panama City, Panama. the entity is named in the first sentence of the Terms of Use (effective 15 January 2026, https://ventuals.com/terms) and again, as "VNTL Markets S.A., a Panamanian corporation", in the Privacy Policy of the same date. js routes whose served HTML carries only a title, and neither is part of the GitBook docs corpus (absent from llms.txt and llms-full.txt), so a corpus search could not find them. The structural qualification stands: VNTL Markets issued no instrument at all. It was a HIP-3 market deployer on Hyperliquid, so this is the operator of the front end and the deployer of the markets, not the issuer of a security or a token - the Terms say so in terms ("We are not a counterparty, broker, exchange, registered securities platform, dealer, or custodian"). Officers were reported by the what-if pass as Alvin Hsia (CEO) and Emily Hsia (CTO) from the sunset-page footer; that is UNVERIFIED - neither name appears in the served HTML, in the React flight payload or in any of the 40 client chunks of app.ventuals.com/sunset, all re-read on 2026-09-18.
Entity jurisdiction
Panama. VNTL Markets S.A. is a Panama corporation with a registered address in Panama City, and the Terms go further than incorporation - they deem every transaction and its effects to occur "solely within the Republic of Panama and not in any other jurisdiction, regardless of where the you may have entered into or closed such Perps", with the trader agreeing not to take a contrary position.
Governing law
Panama. the Terms of Use are "governed by and will be construed under the Panama Arbitration Law, Law No. 131 of 2013 (Official Gazette No. 27 449-C, Jan. 8, 2014) and the laws of the Republic of Panama". Disputes run through a mandatory good-faith negotiation and then binding arbitration in Panama City, in English, administered by the Panama Conciliation and Arbitration Centre, with a jury-trial waiver, an express bar on class or consolidated claims, a 30-day postal opt-out to the Panama City office address, and the courts of the Republic of Panama as the fallback if the arbitration agreement does not apply. Recovery is capped at the greater of one hundred Panamanian balboa (PAB 100.00) and the fees paid to Ventuals in the preceding twelve months, and Ventuals’ officers, directors, employees and contractors are third-party beneficiaries entitled to enforce the Terms against the trader. The forum therefore exists and is identifiable; what it is worth is bounded by that cap.
Regulatory status
unknown / unlicensed, and structurally different from its peers: because a Ventuals position was a cash-settled derivative referencing a valuation rather than a claim on shares, no SPV, share transfer or securities offering was involved. Press coverage framed this as the category's regulatory workaround - a shift "from tokenized stock structures using special purpose vehicles, which have faced legal challenges, to synthetic perpetuals that may avoid some restrictions but could still face future scrutiny from private companies". No CFTC, SEC or offshore registration or exemption was found in any primary source. THE US-PERSON HALF OF THAT SENTENCE WAS WRONG AND IS the Terms of Use (effective 15 January 2026) exclude US persons in terms - "Ventuals is not available to the following persons and entities: (a) persons or entities who reside in the United States of America, or Ontario, Canada" - along with residents and citizens of Restricted Territories and any sanctioned person or entity, and forbid using "a VPN, proxy, Tor, or similar privacy or anonymization tools" to circumvent the geo-blocks. Enforcement was front-end geolocation plus a discretionary termination right, not KYC: no identity verification was ever performed, so screening could only ever be address- and IP-based, and the underlying HIP-3 market was permissionless (Hyperliquid introduced opt-in per-wallet allowlists for HIP-3 markets only in September 2026, after Ventuals had settled everything).
Holder claim
Nothing was owned. A position was a margin position in a Hyperliquid HIP-3 perpetual futures market, cash-settled in USDH. Docs are unambiguous: "Instead of share prices, on Ventuals you trade on whether you think the total valuation of the company is going to go up or down. When you have a position in a company on Ventuals, you do not have any underlying economic ownership in the company - you're merely speculating on its valuation change." Company valuations were divided by 1 billion and quoted as "Valuation Units".
Underlying custodian
none - there were no shares, SPV, holding entity or custodian anywhere in the structure. The only asset involved was USDH margin collateral held in the trader's on-chain HyperCore account. USDH is "deployed through Stripe's stablecoin platform (Bridge), fully backed 1:1 by US Treasuries, cash, and cash equivalents managed by BlackRock".
Redemption and holder eligibility
Available
No
Eligibility
n/a - positions were never redeemable for shares or any underlying. Exit was by closing the position on the order book, or by automatic cash settlement at wind-down.
Route / rails
PnL cash-settled in USDH with no USDH/USD conversion. At wind-down all open positions were settled automatically at a frozen mark price with no action required from traders; users then bridged USDH to USDC via the HyperCore USDH/USDC order book or the 1:1 zero-fee HyperEVM bridge through Across Protocol. UPDATE (2026-09-18): the last leg of that exit has moved and now ends at a KYC gate. usdh.com/migration - the "official USDH sunset information" link in the Sunset Guide - redirects to redeem.bridge.xyz, which reports "USDH Dashboard no longer available. Please follow redemption instructions below" and offers only direct redemption with Bridge: "KYC/KYB required", "Up to a week for verification; 3-5 business days for payout after verification". That is a fact about USDH’s issuer rather than about Ventuals, which required no KYC at any point - but it is the current state of the only published route from a settled Ventuals position to dollars.
KYC
No
Minimum
unknown
Fees
No deposit fees, no withdrawal fees and no cut of native HYPE staking yield on vHYPE - docs: "Ventuals has never earned any fees on vHYPE." Trading fees followed the Hyperliquid HIP-3 venue model.
Timing
Not established
Transfer mechanism
none
US persons excluded
Yes
Backing, custody and insolvency
Collateral ratio
none
Composition
none
Rehypothecation
undisclosed
Bankruptcy remote
Not established
Security interest
No
Verification type
none
Verification agent
Not established
Verification frequency
Not established
Verification notes
Nothing to verify by construction - a fully synthetic derivative has no reserve. This is not a disclosure failure but a category difference: where PreStocks and Tessera invite proof-of-reserve questions, Ventuals had no reserve to prove. What was verifiable was the margin system itself: positions, oracle prices and USDH collateral all lived on Hyperliquid and were publicly inspectable on-chain, with oracle prices pushed roughly every 3 seconds.

How custody affects DeFi enforcement →

Corporate actions and economics
Dividends
none
Voting
none
Corporate actions
n/a - no equity, so no dividends, splits, votes or cap-table events could flow through. The only lifecycle event was the venue's own wind-down, which functioned as a synthetic settlement: effective 9:30am ET 2026-06-15 the OPENAI and ANTHROPIC marks were frozen at their 24-hour TWAPs (mark samples every 5 minutes) and funding rates set to 0, "the fairest settlement mechanic considering that these markets do not have a realtime external reference price". OPENAI halted 10:30am ET 2026-06-15 and settled at $1,341.80; ANTHROPIC halted 11:30am ET 2026-06-15 and settled at $1,618.90. Commodity markets froze to CME prices at 2:20pm ET 2026-06-18 (SOY 2:30pm, WHEAT 3:30pm); index markets froze at 4:00pm ET 2026-06-18 and halted hourly from 4:30pm to 11:30pm ET. vHYPE withdrawals returned HYPE 1:1 plus accrued native staking yield, batch-processed from 10am ET 2026-06-19 and every 24-72 hours thereafter.
Pricing
reference market: platform-mark · arbitrageable: false · notes: Two-thirds self-referential, and the operator said so. Oracle price = (1/3) x Notice valuation estimate + (2/3) x 2-hour EMA of Ventuals' own mark price, pushed on-chain about every 3 seconds. The external third came from Notice (notice.co), polled at least once a minute, incorporating secondary transactions, secondary bids and offers, fundraising announcements, mutual fund marks, 409A valuations and a comparable public-company set. Mark price was itself an EMA of a liquidity-weighted impact price with a dynamic coefficient k that falls to 0 once the impact price deviates 2% or more from its 1-minute EMA, capping mark movement at 0.125-0.2% per update. The operator designed in room for price discovery deliberately, citing the "IPO pop" phenomenon - but the sunset guide concedes outright that these markets "do not have a realtime external reference price", so no arbitrage could anchor them and the settlement price had to be an internal TWAP. The one external validation point in the sector: a Hyperliquid pre-IPO perp priced Cerebras within 1.3% of its $350 Nasdaq opening price.
Primary documents and evidence

Inspect source freshness and individual claims →

Open research questions (8)