RWA Sonar

Issuer programme dossier

Remora Markets

Undocumented.

defunctspv-claim-redeemable0 exact Solana tokensclaim rung 3 · beneficial interest in the security
Observed18 Sep 2026 11:45 UTC Coverage35 of 46 required fields sourced Basis84 structured claims · current reviewed understanding LimitUnknown means not established, never “no”

The short answer

Can you redeem?No

Originally: hold a Remora platform account (KYC for individuals, KYB for businesses); deposit USDC to mint, redeem through the platform.

Understand redemption →
Can the issuer intervene?No listed override is active in the observed token recipes.

Control is reported as observed powers, not collapsed into a score.

Understand issuer powers →

Technology + legal templates

These conclusions apply only to the exact programme and observed control recipe shown.

Current Solana assets

0 exact token addresses currently inherit this issuer-level analysis unless an asset card records an exception.

Legal claim and issuing chain
Issuing entity
unknown. No primary source names a legal issuing entity. The platform was 'formerly Moose Capital', acquired by Step Finance in December 2024 and rebranded; Step Finance said it had integrated Moose Capital's team and regulatory licences. The public site never named a company, and its own Terms & Conditions, Whitepaper and KYC Info pages were published as empty stubs (verified in the Wayback capture of 2025-05-16). Note: 'Remora Capital Corporation' (Maryland, SEC CIK 2045370) is a middle-market credit BDC and is NOT related.
Entity jurisdiction
unknown. The About page claimed only an 'Asset management license in premium offshore jurisdictions' and that 'Custodial services [are] managed by Wealth Management providers regulated in UAE'; secondary reporting says Remora was registered in Canada and the UAE. Circumstantial support for the UAE: app.remora.markets is a CNAME to mooseprodapialb-2015871155.me-central-1.elb.amazonaws.com — an AWS load balancer in the UAE (me-central-1) region, whose name preserves the 'Moose' origin. Re-checked 2026-09-18 against both 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8: the CNAME record itself is STILL published, so this piece of circumstantial UAE evidence remains checkable; it is the AWS target that no longer exists, which is why an A lookup for app.remora.markets returns NXDOMAIN.
Governing law
unknown — never published. The /terms-conditions/ page existed but contained no terms.
Regulatory status
unknown / self-asserted only. Claimed an unnamed offshore asset-management licence and UAE-regulated custodial providers; no regulator, licence number, prospectus or exemption was ever published. The platform was not available to users in the United States or Europe pending approvals, and required KYB for business users.
Holder claim
Undocumented. In practice the holder held a platform-issued token that the operator asserted was backed 1:1 by the corresponding security or metal held through an unnamed regulated custodian, redeemable through the platform for USDC. No terms, prospectus or note conditions were ever published, so the legal nature, ranking and enforceability of the claim are unknown; post-wind-down the operator characterised it as a USDC redemption claim rather than a claim to the share.
Underlying custodian
unknown — never named. The About page said only 'Custodial services managed by Wealth Management providers regulated in UAE'.
Redemption and holder eligibility
Available
No
Eligibility
Originally: hold a Remora platform account (KYC for individuals, KYB for businesses); deposit USDC to mint, redeem through the platform. Post-wind-down: the operator said it was 'developing a redemption process for holders to exchange for USDC', and on 2026-03-02 deployed exit liquidity on Manifest DEX priced at the prior Friday's market close, reachable through the Jupiter and Titan swap routers — i.e. open to any token holder via a DEX rather than a contractual redemption right. Re-checked 2026-09-18: that route is gone too. Jupiter, the router the wind-down told holders to use, refuses to quote the rTokens at all (TOKEN_NOT_TRADABLE on TSLAr, GLDr, SPYr and CRCLr; NO_ROUTES_FOUND on NVDAr), the Manifest exit book appears in no aggregator's pool list, and the only pools left are the original 2025 trading pools holding $13.47 across four TSLAr pools, $0.30 on GLDr and $1,040.51 on NVDAr at zero 24-hour volume except $370.99 on NVDAr/USDC. There is no redemption right, no redemption process and now no market: redemption.available is recorded false.
Route / rails
Originally USDC on Solana (mint and redeem); post-wind-down, a DEX exit-liquidity pool on Manifest routed via Jupiter/Titan. As of 2026-09-18 no rail functions: Jupiter will not quote the mints and the residual Raydium pools hold double-digit dollars. Withdrawal of the token itself to self-custody still works, which is not a redemption rail.
KYC
Yes
Minimum
unknown — fractional shares supported (9 decimals)
Fees
unknown
Timing
Not established
Transfer mechanism
permanent-delegate
US persons excluded
Yes
Backing, custody and insolvency
Collateral ratio
1:1
Composition
shares
Rehypothecation
undisclosed
Bankruptcy remote
Not established
Security interest
Not established
Verification type
none
Verification agent
unknown
Verification frequency
Claimed 'Monthly Proof of Reserve audits' on the About page; no auditor named, no report ever located
Verification notes
No proof-of-reserve page, report, feed or oracle was found from any primary source. There is no Chainlink PoR feed, no attestation firm named, and no API. Post-wind-down the operator merely asserted that 'all rTokens are still fully backed at a 1:1 ratio' with no supporting evidence. The claim of monthly third-party PoR audits should be treated as unverified marketing, not an attestation.

How custody affects DeFi enforcement →

Corporate actions and economics
Dividends
unknown
Voting
none
Corporate actions
unknown. The mints carry the Token-2022 scaledUiAmountConfig extension — the same mechanism xStocks uses for rebasing dividends and splits — but the multiplier is 1 with no scheduled change on every mint inspected (TSLAr, NVDAr, GLDr), so no rebasing had ever been applied. No dividend, split or delisting policy was ever published.
Pricing
reference market: platform-mark · notes: Minting was priced at 'the current price on traditional exchanges' per the platform's own How It Works page — a platform mark, with no named oracle. Arbitrage depended entirely on the platform's mint/redeem window being open to the arbitrageur, which required an account; that window is now closed. The wind-down exit liquidity was priced off the prior Friday's market close, i.e. a stale mark. Third-party valuations disagree THREE ways for the same platform within a day, across more than two orders of magnitude: CoinGecko's 'Remora Markets Tokenized rStocks' category reports a ~$138.9M aggregate market cap, RWA.xyz reports $1.87M distributed asset value, and DefiLlama reports $479,846. Nor is any one of them self-consistent: DefiLlama's own daily series records $0 on 42 days between 2026-07-02 and 2026-09-10 before returning to $479,846. Treat all third-party valuation figures for these tokens as unreliable.
Primary documents and evidence

Inspect source freshness and individual claims →

Open research questions (7)